Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
Mercedes-Benz Antos, 315 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry vs Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Mercedes-Benz Antos, 315 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
2013–2020 · 315 kW
37.1l/100 km
median; 34.9–38.1 across 6 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
2019 · 338 kW
38.2l/100 km
median; 36.4–41.2 across 36 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 1.1 l/100 km between these two (2.9%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,320 litres a year (£1,848). The declared figures for one of them alone span 4.8 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Antos, 315 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry44,520 litres
£62,328 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry45,840 litres
£64,176 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.