Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 290 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry vs Volvo FMX, 285 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 290 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
2020–2023 · 290 kW
36.2l/100 km
median; 33.3–44.1 across 66 declared configurations
Volvo FMX, 285 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
2021–2023 · 285 kW
34.2l/100 km
median; 31.2–42.5 across 40 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2 l/100 km between these two (5.8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,400 litres a year (£3,360). The declared figures for one of them alone span 11.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Arocs, 290 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry43,440 litres
£60,816 at the assumed price
Volvo FMX, 285 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry41,040 litres
£57,456 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.