Comparison · 4×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Renault T, 285 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2015–2022) vs Volvo FM, 278 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2019)
Renault T, 285 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2015–2022)
2015–2022 · 285 kW
31.7l/100 km
median; 28.5–35.3 across 5 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 278 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2019)
2016–2019 · 278 kW
32.9l/100 km
median; 32.5–36.2 across 8 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 1.2 l/100 km between these two (3.7%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,440 litres a year (£2,016). The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.8 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceRenault T, 285 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2015–2022)38,040 litres
£53,256 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 278 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2019)39,480 litres
£55,272 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.