Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 340 B6x2*4 vs Volvo FMX, 251 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

Scania G 340 B6x2*4

2020–2022 · 250–251 kW (median 251)
l/100 km

Volvo FMX, 251 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

2021–2022 · 251 kW
36.9l/100 km
median; 34.4–41.9 across 9 declared configurations
Scania G 340 B6x2*4 and Volvo FMX, 251 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania G 340 B6x2*4Volvo FMX, 251 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2021–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power250–251 kWDeclaredmedian 251 kW, across 24 declared configurations251 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9.3 litresDeclared10.8 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, automaticDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 24 declared configurations26,100–33,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 30 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haulNot declared36.9 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 34.4–41.9 l/100 km across 9 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-kmNot declared50.1 g Declaredmedian; 46.6–56.8 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

We publish the table but give no verdict: they have no fuel figure declared on the same mission, payload and reporting period.