Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2022) vs Scania P 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2023)

Scania G 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2022)

2019–2022 · 302 kW
34.4l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania P 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2023)

2019–2023 · 302 kW
31.8l/100 km
median; 31.8–34.8 across 5 declared configurations
Scania G 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2022) and Scania P 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2023) side by side
SpecificationScania G 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2022)Scania P 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2023)
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration4×2Declared4×2Declared
Registered new2019–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power302 kWDeclared302 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomated, manualDeclared
Gross vehicle weight19,000–20,500 kgDeclaredmedian 19,500 kg, across 13 declared configurations18,600–20,500 kgDeclaredmedian 19,000 kg, across 30 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul34.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration31.8 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 31.8–34.8 l/100 km across 5 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km46.6 g Declaredmedian43.06 g Declaredmedian; 43.05–47.2 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2021 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.6 l/100 km between these two (8.1%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,120 litres a year (£4,368). The declared figures for one of them alone span 3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2022)41,280 litres
£57,792 at the assumed price
Scania P 410 A4x2, lorry (2019–2023)38,160 litres
£53,424 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.