Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania R 770 B6x2*4 vs Scania S 770 B6x2

Scania R 770 B6x2*4

2021–2023 · 566 kW
37l/100 km
median; 33.6–38.8 across 14 declared configurations

Scania S 770 B6x2

2021–2023 · 566 kW
36l/100 km
median; 34.2–39.1 across 12 declared configurations
Scania R 770 B6x2*4 and Scania S 770 B6x2 side by side
SpecificationScania R 770 B6x2*4Scania S 770 B6x2
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2021–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2021–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power566 kWDeclared566 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.4 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,500–31,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 58 declared configurations27,000–31,000 kgDeclaredmedian 30,000 kg, across 33 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul37 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 33.6–38.8 l/100 km across 14 declared configurations36 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 34.2–39.1 l/100 km across 12 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km50.2 g Declaredmedian; 45.6–52.7 g48.78 g Declaredmedian; 46.3–53 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1 l/100 km between these two (2.7%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,200 litres a year (£1,680). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.2 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 770 B6x2*444,400 litres
£62,160 at the assumed price
Scania S 770 B6x243,200 litres
£60,480 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.