Comparison · 4×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Volvo FM, 315 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2020) vs Volvo FM, 338 kW, 4x2 tractor unit
Volvo FM, 315 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2020)
2016–2020 · 315 kW
35.1l/100 km
median; 30.3–41.7 across 48 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 4x2 tractor unit
2014–2019 · 338 kW
37.3l/100 km
median; 32.8–39.5 across 28 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.2 l/100 km between these two (6.2%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,640 litres a year (£3,696). The declared figures for one of them alone span 11.4 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FM, 315 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2020)42,120 litres
£58,968 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 4x2 tractor unit44,760 litres
£62,664 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.