Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries: which uses the least fuel?
Every model here was simulated by its manufacturer on the EU municipal utility mission, with the payload the regulation sets, and declared to the regulator. Figures are compared only within one reporting year and one payload. A model is ranked when at least ten declared vehicles stand behind its figure.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2022 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scania G 460 B4x2 | 71 | 71–71.7 | 5 | 14 | 618.99 | 618.99–625.67 |
| 1 | Scania P 460 B4x2 | 71 | 70.2–71.9 | 11 | 17 | 618.88 | 612.38–626.74 |
| 3 | Scania S 460 B4x2 | 71.2 | 70.4–72.9 | 13 | 20 | 620.73 | 614.16–635.71 |
| 4 | Scania R 460 B4x2 | 71.4 | 70.2–72.9 | 17 | 28 | 622.35 | 612.67–635.62 |
| 5 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 72.2 | 70.8–78.2 | 12 | 27 | 629.82 | 617.56–682.3 |
| 6 | Scania R 420 B4x2 | 72.7 | 71.5–73.4 | 19 | 28 | 633.73 | 623.89–640.23 |
| 7 | Scania G 420 B4x2 | 72.8 | 71.5–73.7 | 10 | 10 | 635.39 | 623.28–642.53 |
| 8 | Scania P 420 B4x2 | 73.1 | 71.2–84.6 | 32 | 43 | 637.91 | 620.89–737.8 |
| 9 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 74.9 | 73.6–77 | 16 | 17 | 653.72 | 641.7–671.69 |
| 9 | Volvo FH, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 74.9 | 73.3–82.9 | 44 | 79 | 653.37 | 639.02–722.8 |
| 11 | Scania R 360 B4x2 | 75.1 | 74.5–76.3 | 13 | 24 | 655.19 | 649.99–665.74 |
| 12 | Volvo FMX, 323 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75.4 | 74.2–81.1 | 11 | 18 | 657.36 | 647.21–707.7 |
| 13 | MAN TGX 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 75.6 | 74.9–78.8 | 80 | 152 | 659.52 | 653.66–687.1 |
| 14 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 75.7 | 74.2–78.2 | 27 | 34 | 660.57 | 647.29–681.89 |
| 15 | Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75.8 | 74.5–83.4 | 11 | 12 | 660.91 | 649.39–727.12 |
| 16 | DAF XD 370 FA | 76.1 | 74.7–80 | 29 | 35 | 663.45 | 651.46–698.1 |
| 16 | DAF XF 370 FA | 76.1 | 75.1–78.2 | 11 | 11 | 663.63 | 655.3–682 |
| 16 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 76.1 | 72.4–97.5 | 81 | 109 | 664.1 | 631.07–850.3 |
| 19 | DAF XF 450 FA | 76.2 | 74.2–77.5 | 31 | 36 | 664.28 | 647.1–675.99 |
| 19 | Scania R 540 B4x2 | 76.2 | 75.1–78.4 | 10 | 11 | 664.7 | 655.33–683.78 |
| 19 | Scania S 500 B4x2 | 76.2 | 69.8–78.4 | 12 | 13 | 664.6 | 609.06–683.4 |
| 19 | Volvo FM, 323 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 76.2 | 74.6–94.3 | 27 | 40 | 664.66 | 650.43–822.9 |
| 23 | MAN TGS 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.3 | 74.7–79.8 | 37 | 39 | 665.52 | 651.69–696.4 |
| 23 | MAN TGX 18.510 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.3 | 74.8–80.2 | 36 | 39 | 665.51 | 652.03–699.51 |
| 23 | Scania R 410 B4x2 | 76.3 | 75.3–79.7 | 22 | 28 | 665.76 | 656.64–694.78 |
| 23 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 76.3 | 75.4–78.2 | 38 | 53 | 665.49 | 657.85–682.1 |
| 27 | MAN TGS 18.510 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 76.4 | 73.6–80.8 | 18 | 18 | 666.75 | 642.24–704.54 |
| 27 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.4 | 74.8–78.7 | 32 | 33 | 666.29 | 652.48–686.6 |
| 27 | MAN TGX 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.4 | 74.5–79.5 | 59 | 76 | 666.2 | 649.76–693.19 |
| 30 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 76.5 | 75.4–88.5 | 35 | 85 | 667.3 | 657.36–771.8 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 93 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 18.5 l/100 km apart (26%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 22,200 litres a year, or £31,080.
Where it stops mattering: 52 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the Volvo FE, 188 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry alone span 32.2 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
39 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
| Scania S 420 B4x2 | 309 kW | 71.7 l/100 km3 vehicles |
|---|---|---|
| MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 73.6 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| Scania S 410 B4x2 | 302 kW | 75.6 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| Volvo FMX, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 10.8 L (2021–2023) | 345 kW | 75.8 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 22.400 4x2 | 294 kW | 76.1 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| MAN TGX 18.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 76.1 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| DAF XD 450 FA | 330 kW | 76.5 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| DAF XF 410 FA, 10.8 L (from 2022) | 300 kW | 76.6 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF XG+ 450 FA | 330 kW | 76.7 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| DAF CF 430 FA | 315 kW | 77 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 200 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 200 kW | 77.1 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| Scania R 280 B4x2 | 206 kW | 77.4 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF CF 480 FA | 355 kW | 77.7 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Scania G 540 B4x2 | 397 kW | 77.7 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG+ 530 FA | 390 kW | 78 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| DAF CF 530 FA | 390 kW | 78.1 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Scania S 450 B4x2 | 331 kW | 78.1 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| Scania S 370 B4x2 | 272 kW | 78.2 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF CF 230 FA | 166 kW | 78.4 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG 430 FA | 315 kW | 78.4 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF XF 530 FA | 390 kW | 79 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 350 kW | 79.4 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Scania L 280 B4x2, 6.7 L (2020–2023) | 206 kW | 79.5 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 18.440 4x2, 12.4 L, rigid lorry (2013–2025) | 324 kW | 79.7 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| MAN TGS 22.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 80.8 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Iveco X-Way, 251 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 251 kW | 80.9 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 375 kW | 82 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| Scania L 280 B4x2, 9.3 L (2019–2023) | 206 kW | 82.3 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| Scania L 360 B4x2 | 265 kW | 82.3 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 18.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 82.8 l/100 km1 vehicle |
9 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 3 t, reporting period 2022.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2022 declarationsLowest: Scania G 460 B4x2, 68.3 l/100 km · 93 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2022 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scania G 460 B4x2 | 68.3 | 68.3–68.7 | 5 | 14 | 2,979.32 | 2,979.32–2,994.28 |
| 1 | Scania P 460 B4x2 | 68.3 | 67.4–68.9 | 11 | 17 | 2,978.22 | 2,937.94–3,006.23 |
| 3 | Scania S 460 B4x2 | 68.4 | 67.6–69.9 | 13 | 20 | 2,981.3 | 2,949.01–3,050.59 |
| 4 | Scania R 460 B4x2 | 68.7 | 67.6–69.8 | 17 | 28 | 2,995.14 | 2,946.32–3,045.7 |
| 5 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 69.3 | 68–75.2 | 12 | 27 | 3,023.8 | 2,965.66–3,279.1 |
| 6 | Scania G 420 B4x2 | 69.8 | 68.9–70.5 | 10 | 10 | 3,043.23 | 3,004.6–3,075.27 |
| 7 | Scania R 420 B4x2 | 70.1 | 68.6–70.6 | 19 | 28 | 3,057.02 | 2,992.78–3,080.72 |
| 8 | Scania P 420 B4x2 | 70.3 | 68.6–81.3 | 32 | 43 | 3,064.37 | 2,990.4–3,545.9 |
| 9 | Scania R 360 B4x2 | 71.7 | 71.2–72.9 | 13 | 24 | 3,125.01 | 3,106.49–3,179.14 |
| 10 | Volvo FH, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 71.9 | 70.5–79.9 | 44 | 79 | 3,133.84 | 3,075.47–3,485.6 |
| 11 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 72.1 | 70.9–73.6 | 16 | 17 | 3,143.2 | 3,093.7–3,209.1 |
| 12 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 72.3 | 71–74.8 | 27 | 34 | 3,151.87 | 3,096.82–3,260.94 |
| 13 | Volvo FMX, 323 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 72.6 | 71.8–78.8 | 11 | 18 | 3,167.37 | 3,132.3–3,437.4 |
| 14 | MAN TGX 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 72.9 | 72.1–76.1 | 80 | 152 | 3,180.6 | 3,145.96–3,320 |
| 15 | Scania R 540 B4x2 | 73 | 72.2–74.9 | 10 | 11 | 3,183.7 | 3,146.88–3,267.59 |
| 15 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 73 | 69.5–93 | 81 | 109 | 3,184.96 | 3,032.95–4,054.9 |
| 17 | DAF XF 450 FA | 73.1 | 71.4–74.8 | 31 | 36 | 3,189.28 | 3,114.4–3,261.8 |
| 17 | Scania S 500 B4x2 | 73.1 | 67.2–75.6 | 12 | 13 | 3,190.1 | 2,929.05–3,296.7 |
| 17 | Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 73.1 | 71.6–79.9 | 11 | 12 | 3,187.6 | 3,124.73–3,486.3 |
| 20 | DAF XD 370 FA | 73.2 | 71.6–77.4 | 29 | 35 | 3,192.33 | 3,124.53–3,374.5 |
| 20 | DAF XF 370 FA | 73.2 | 72.4–75.3 | 11 | 11 | 3,193.9 | 3,156.72–3,282.5 |
| 20 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 73.2 | 71.9–75.4 | 32 | 33 | 3,192.97 | 3,134.74–3,288.4 |
| 23 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 73.3 | 71.4–74.7 | 54 | 58 | 3,197.97 | 3,114.93–3,257.8 |
| 23 | MAN TGS 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 73.3 | 71.6–77.3 | 37 | 39 | 3,196.4 | 3,120.77–3,372.4 |
| 23 | MAN TGS 18.510 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 73.3 | 70.6–78 | 18 | 18 | 3,198.35 | 3,079.79–3,400.51 |
| 23 | MAN TGX 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 73.3 | 71.8–76.7 | 59 | 76 | 3,197.52 | 3,130.7–3,346.42 |
| 23 | Scania R 410 B4x2 | 73.3 | 72.3–76.8 | 22 | 28 | 3,195.23 | 3,153.31–3,350.25 |
| 23 | Volvo FM, 323 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 73.3 | 71.8–91.4 | 27 | 40 | 3,197.88 | 3,130.12–3,987.9 |
| 29 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 73.4 | 72.5–75.3 | 38 | 53 | 3,202.9 | 3,162.82–3,284.1 |
| 30 | MAN TGX 18.510 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 73.5 | 71.7–77.3 | 36 | 39 | 3,203.96 | 3,129.01–3,371.93 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 93 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 17.9 l/100 km apart (26.2%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 21,480 litres a year, or £30,072.
Where it stops mattering: 55 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the Volvo FE, 188 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry alone span 32.1 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
39 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
| Scania S 420 B4x2 | 309 kW | 69.2 l/100 km3 vehicles |
|---|---|---|
| MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 69.7 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| Scania S 410 B4x2 | 302 kW | 72.6 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 22.400 4x2 | 294 kW | 72.8 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| MAN TGX 18.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 72.8 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Volvo FMX, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 10.8 L (2021–2023) | 345 kW | 73 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF XD 450 FA | 330 kW | 73.3 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| DAF XF 410 FA, 10.8 L (from 2022) | 300 kW | 73.6 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF XG+ 450 FA | 330 kW | 73.8 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 200 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 200 kW | 74.1 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF CF 430 FA | 315 kW | 74.3 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Scania R 280 B4x2 | 206 kW | 74.3 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF CF 530 FA | 390 kW | 74.5 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF CF 480 FA | 355 kW | 75 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Scania G 540 B4x2 | 397 kW | 75 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Scania S 370 B4x2 | 272 kW | 75 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Scania S 450 B4x2 | 331 kW | 75 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF XG+ 530 FA | 390 kW | 75.2 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| DAF CF 230 FA | 166 kW | 75.3 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG 430 FA | 315 kW | 75.5 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF XF 530 FA | 390 kW | 76.3 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 350 kW | 76.6 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Scania L 280 B4x2, 6.7 L (2020–2023) | 206 kW | 76.6 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 18.440 4x2, 12.4 L, rigid lorry (2013–2025) | 324 kW | 76.8 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Iveco X-Way, 251 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 251 kW | 77.3 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 22.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 77.3 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Scania L 360 B4x2 | 265 kW | 78.4 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Scania L 280 B4x2, 9.3 L (2019–2023) | 206 kW | 78.6 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 375 kW | 79.2 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 18.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 79.6 l/100 km1 vehicle |
9 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 0.6 t, reporting period 2022.
Earlier reporting periods
The same comparison on earlier declarations. Rankings are never mixed across years.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2021 declarationsLowest: DAF XF 450 FA, 75.3 l/100 km · 72 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2021 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DAF XF 450 FA | 75.3 | 74–77.3 | 34 | 56 | 656.6 | 645.5–674 |
| 2 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 75.8 | 74.2–77.9 | 27 | 29 | 661.2 | 646.9–679.6 |
| 3 | Scania R 540 B4x2 | 76.2 | 75.7–77.9 | 7 | 10 | 664.7 | 660.2–679.9 |
| 3 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 76.2 | 72.2–81.7 | 53 | 77 | 664.9 | 630.1–713 |
| 5 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.3 | 73.9–78.5 | 39 | 43 | 665.6 | 644.9–684.3 |
| 5 | Scania R 500 B4x2 | 76.3 | 75.5–81.2 | 13 | 15 | 665.4 | 658.6–708.5 |
| 7 | MAN TGS 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2022) | 76.5 | 74–91.1 | 78 | 81 | 667.6 | 645.2–794.5 |
| 8 | MAN TGX 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.6 | 74.7–81.7 | 97 | 133 | 668 | 651.7–712.6 |
| 8 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 76.6 | 75.5–88.6 | 89 | 171 | 668.1 | 658.4–772.9 |
| 10 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 76.8 | 74.9–79.1 | 49 | 86 | 669.8 | 653.6–690.1 |
| 10 | Scania S 450 B4x2 | 76.8 | 75.8–78.1 | 15 | 22 | 670.1 | 661.4–681 |
| 12 | Scania R 410 B4x2 | 77 | 75.8–81.3 | 41 | 50 | 671.7 | 660.9–709.2 |
| 13 | MAN TGX 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 77.2 | 75.1–83.4 | 107 | 187 | 673.5 | 655.2–727.6 |
| 13 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 77.2 | 73.5–81.9 | 19 | 20 | 673 | 640.8–714.4 |
| 15 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 77.5 | 75.5–82.2 | 84 | 92 | 676.1 | 658.5–716.9 |
| 15 | DAF CF 370 FA | 77.5 | 77.2–79.6 | 40 | 109 | 676 | 673.2–693.9 |
| 17 | Scania G 450 B4x2 | 77.6 | 75.8–82.6 | 15 | 16 | 676.7 | 661.2–720.7 |
| 18 | DAF XF 480 FA | 77.8 | 76.6–79.1 | 51 | 80 | 678.4 | 667.9–689.8 |
| 19 | MAN TGS 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 77.9 | 74.8–103.6 | 115 | 122 | 679.1 | 652.8–903.4 |
| 19 | Scania G 280 B4x2 | 77.9 | 77.8–83.7 | 9 | 25 | 679.1 | 678.6–729.7 |
| 21 | MAN TGS 18.330 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 78 | 74.9–84.1 | 83 | 85 | 680.2 | 653.1–733.3 |
| 22 | Scania G 320 B4x2 | 78.2 | 77.2–80.9 | 13 | 20 | 682.2 | 673.6–706 |
| 23 | Scania G 370 B4x2 | 78.3 | 76.6–85.2 | 13 | 14 | 683.2 | 668.2–742.8 |
| 23 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 78.3 | 75.9–79.8 | 13 | 13 | 682.7 | 662.3–696 |
| 25 | MAN TGX 18.510 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 78.4 | 76.3–81.1 | 36 | 37 | 683.7 | 665.8–707.3 |
| 25 | Scania R 320 B4x2 | 78.4 | 76.2–79.7 | 16 | 24 | 683.7 | 664.7–695.4 |
| 27 | DAF CF 430 FA | 78.5 | 77.3–88.7 | 10 | 14 | 684.3 | 674.1–773.5 |
| 27 | DAF XF 530 FA | 78.5 | 76.4–79.7 | 11 | 11 | 685 | 666.4–695.3 |
| 27 | MAN TGS 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 78.5 | 76–91.8 | 41 | 42 | 684.7 | 663.2–800.6 |
| 30 | Scania G 540 B4x2 | 78.7 | 78.2–79.6 | 6 | 19 | 686.3 | 682.4–694.6 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 72 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 17.3 l/100 km apart (22.9%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 20,760 litres a year, or £29,064.
Where it stops mattering: 57 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the MAN TGS 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) alone span 28.8 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
46 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
| Scania R 360 B4x2 | 265 kW | 74.4 l/100 km4 vehicles |
|---|---|---|
| MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 76.1 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 22.400 4x2 | 294 kW | 76.1 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG+ 450 FA | 330 kW | 76.6 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF XF 410 FA, 10.8 L (from 2022) | 300 kW | 77 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| MAN TGX 18.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 77.2 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| Scania S 410 B4x2 | 302 kW | 77.2 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Scania S 540 B4x2 | 397 kW | 77.2 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| DAF CF 530 FA | 390 kW | 77.3 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| MAN TGS 22.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 77.7 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| DAF CF 480 FA | 355 kW | 77.8 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| Scania S 500 B4x2 | 368 kW | 78 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| DAF XG 480 FA | 355 kW | 78.5 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 335 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 335 kW | 78.7 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| Scania R 280 B4x2 | 206 kW | 78.8 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Scania S 370 B4x2 | 272 kW | 78.8 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG 450 FA | 330 kW | 79.1 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Iveco Stralis, 243 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 8.7 L (2019–2021) | 243 kW | 79.9 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF CF 230 FA | 166 kW | 80 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| DAF XD 410 FA | 300 kW | 80.1 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 375 kW | 80.3 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Scania R 370 B4x2 | 272 kW | 80.5 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Iveco S-Way, 251 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 251 kW | 80.7 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 220 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 220 kW | 80.8 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Scania L 280 B4x2, 6.7 L (2020–2023) | 206 kW | 81.2 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| DAF XG+ 480 FA | 355 kW | 81.8 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 350 kW | 82.3 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 200 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 200 kW | 82.6 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| Scania R 530 B4x2 | 390 kW | 82.6 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 18.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 82.8 l/100 km1 vehicle |
16 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 3 t, reporting period 2021.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2021 declarationsLowest: DAF XF 450 FA, 72.4 l/100 km · 72 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2021 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DAF XF 450 FA | 72.4 | 71.1–74.2 | 34 | 56 | 3,159.3 | 3,101.9–3,237.7 |
| 2 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 72.8 | 71.7–75 | 27 | 29 | 3,176.9 | 3,124.9–3,269.4 |
| 3 | Scania R 540 B4x2 | 73 | 72.7–74.8 | 7 | 10 | 3,183.7 | 3,170.6–3,264.2 |
| 4 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 73.1 | 69–77.3 | 53 | 77 | 3,186.4 | 3,011.2–3,372.5 |
| 5 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 73.4 | 71.4–75.5 | 39 | 43 | 3,202.2 | 3,113–3,293 |
| 6 | MAN TGS 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2022) | 73.5 | 71.2–88 | 78 | 81 | 3,206.9 | 3,104.8–3,838.9 |
| 6 | Scania R 500 B4x2 | 73.5 | 72.8–78.4 | 13 | 15 | 3,207.6 | 3,174.3–3,419 |
| 8 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 73.6 | 70.9–78.7 | 19 | 20 | 3,211.7 | 3,093.9–3,431.7 |
| 9 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 73.7 | 72.8–85 | 89 | 171 | 3,212.3 | 3,174.1–3,706.8 |
| 10 | MAN TGX 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 74 | 72.1–79 | 97 | 133 | 3,226.7 | 3,145.9–3,445 |
| 11 | Scania S 450 B4x2 | 74.1 | 73.3–75.2 | 15 | 22 | 3,233.3 | 3,196.1–3,279.2 |
| 12 | Scania R 410 B4x2 | 74.2 | 73.2–78.6 | 41 | 50 | 3,234.7 | 3,191.4–3,427.3 |
| 12 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 74.2 | 72.4–76 | 49 | 86 | 3,235.7 | 3,159.5–3,313.5 |
| 14 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 74.3 | 72.4–78.5 | 84 | 92 | 3,240.6 | 3,158.7–3,423.8 |
| 15 | MAN TGX 18.470 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 74.6 | 72.5–80.6 | 108 | 188 | 3,251.5 | 3,161.2–3,513.5 |
| 16 | DAF CF 370 FA | 74.7 | 74.4–76.5 | 40 | 109 | 3,256.9 | 3,244.2–3,338.4 |
| 16 | Scania G 450 B4x2 | 74.7 | 73.2–80 | 15 | 16 | 3,256.1 | 3,190.7–3,489.1 |
| 18 | Scania G 280 B4x2 | 74.8 | 74.4–80.2 | 9 | 25 | 3,263.9 | 3,246.8–3,497.8 |
| 19 | DAF XF 480 FA | 74.9 | 73.6–76.4 | 51 | 80 | 3,268.5 | 3,211–3,332.6 |
| 20 | MAN TGS 18.330 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 75 | 72.1–80.5 | 83 | 85 | 3,271.2 | 3,143–3,511.4 |
| 21 | MAN TGS 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) | 75.1 | 71.9–100.2 | 115 | 122 | 3,275.6 | 3,137.3–4,370.2 |
| 22 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 75.2 | 73.4–76.7 | 13 | 13 | 3,281 | 3,201.9–3,344.7 |
| 23 | Scania G 320 B4x2 | 75.3 | 74.3–77.1 | 13 | 20 | 3,283.2 | 3,242.4–3,363.1 |
| 24 | Scania R 320 B4x2 | 75.4 | 73.5–76.2 | 16 | 24 | 3,290.4 | 3,207.1–3,321.9 |
| 25 | Scania G 370 B4x2 | 75.5 | 73.9–82.4 | 13 | 14 | 3,294.2 | 3,223.8–3,591.6 |
| 25 | Scania P 250 B4x2, 6.7 L (2019–2023) | 75.5 | 73.3–85.2 | 78 | 125 | 3,293.8 | 3,195.1–3,714 |
| 27 | DAF CF 430 FA | 75.6 | 74.7–85.8 | 10 | 14 | 3,295.7 | 3,256.9–3,742.5 |
| 27 | Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 240 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75.6 | 75–80 | 20 | 38 | 3,296.1 | 3,271.1–3,487.3 |
| 29 | DAF CF 260 FA | 75.7 | 74.5–84.9 | 19 | 22 | 3,300 | 3,250.4–3,704.1 |
| 29 | DAF XF 530 FA | 75.7 | 73.5–77 | 11 | 11 | 3,300.3 | 3,205.6–3,359.6 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 72 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 17.1 l/100 km apart (23.6%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 20,520 litres a year, or £28,728.
Where it stops mattering: 57 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the MAN TGS 18.430 4x2, rigid lorry (2020–2023) alone span 28.3 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
46 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
| Scania R 360 B4x2 | 265 kW | 71.6 l/100 km4 vehicles |
|---|---|---|
| MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 72.7 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 22.400 4x2 | 294 kW | 73.1 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG+ 450 FA | 330 kW | 73.8 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF XF 410 FA, 10.8 L (from 2022) | 300 kW | 74.1 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Scania S 410 B4x2 | 302 kW | 74.2 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| MAN TGX 18.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 74.3 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| DAF CF 530 FA | 390 kW | 74.6 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Scania S 540 B4x2 | 397 kW | 74.6 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| MAN TGS 22.330 4x2 | 243 kW | 74.8 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| Scania R 280 B4x2 | 206 kW | 74.9 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF CF 480 FA | 355 kW | 75.1 l/100 km9 vehicles |
| Scania S 500 B4x2 | 368 kW | 75.4 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| DAF XG 480 FA | 355 kW | 75.7 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| DAF XG 450 FA | 330 kW | 75.8 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 335 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 335 kW | 75.8 l/100 km6 vehicles |
| DAF CF 230 FA | 166 kW | 75.9 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| Scania S 370 B4x2 | 272 kW | 76 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Iveco Stralis, 243 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 8.7 L (2019–2021) | 243 kW | 76.7 l/100 km3 vehicles |
| DAF XD 410 FA | 300 kW | 77.2 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Scania R 370 B4x2 | 272 kW | 77.2 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 375 kW | 77.3 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Iveco S-Way, 251 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 251 kW | 77.4 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 220 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 220 kW | 77.5 l/100 km7 vehicles |
| Scania L 280 B4x2, 6.7 L (2020–2023) | 206 kW | 77.6 l/100 km2 vehicles |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 200 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 200 kW | 78.7 l/100 km5 vehicles |
| DAF XG+ 480 FA | 355 kW | 79 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| MAN TGS 18.320 4x2 | 235 kW | 79.6 l/100 km1 vehicle |
| Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 350 kW | 79.6 l/100 km4 vehicles |
| Iveco X-Way, 251 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 251 kW | 80.2 l/100 km1 vehicle |
16 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 0.6 t, reporting period 2021.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2020 declarationsLowest: Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 74.8 l/100 km · 68 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2020 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 74.8 | 71.1–96.2 | 33 | 36 | 652.8 | 619.9–838.8 |
| 2 | DAF XF 450 FA | 74.9 | 73.9–78.3 | 31 | 75 | 653.7 | 644.9–683.3 |
| 3 | Scania R 360 B4x2 | 75.1 | 75–78.6 | 7 | 13 | 654.7 | 654.6–685.2 |
| 4 | MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 75.3 | 74.1–80.4 | 15 | 15 | 656.9 | 646.5–701.5 |
| 5 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 76.3 | 73.4–80.7 | 20 | 24 | 665.8 | 640.2–704.3 |
| 6 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 76.6 | 75.7–77.6 | 21 | 21 | 668.3 | 659.9–677.2 |
| 7 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 76.8 | 75.9–87.4 | 74 | 148 | 669.6 | 661.9–762.1 |
| 7 | Scania S 450 B4x2 | 76.8 | 75.6–78.3 | 19 | 26 | 669.7 | 659.1–682.8 |
| 9 | MAN TGS 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2022) | 76.9 | 75.2–81.8 | 53 | 62 | 670.5 | 656–713.4 |
| 9 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 76.9 | 74.9–79 | 63 | 101 | 671 | 653.6–688.8 |
| 11 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 77.1 | 74.5–78.7 | 43 | 47 | 672.7 | 650.1–686.4 |
| 11 | Scania S 410 B4x2 | 77.1 | 76.2–78.5 | 12 | 15 | 672.8 | 664.4–684.3 |
| 13 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 77.2 | 75.9–80.8 | 113 | 122 | 673.3 | 661.7–704.5 |
| 13 | Scania R 500 B4x2 | 77.2 | 76.3–79.2 | 19 | 21 | 673 | 665.7–690.9 |
| 13 | Scania S 500 B4x2 | 77.2 | 76.5–79.1 | 11 | 12 | 673.1 | 666.8–690.3 |
| 16 | DAF CF 370 FA | 77.5 | 76.7–81.1 | 36 | 88 | 676 | 669–707.1 |
| 16 | MAN TGS 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2021) | 77.5 | 75–89.3 | 70 | 73 | 676 | 653.8–779.2 |
| 16 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 77.5 | 76.5–82.7 | 14 | 14 | 676.1 | 667.1–721.1 |
| 19 | DAF XF 480 FA | 77.8 | 76.3–80.1 | 51 | 73 | 678.9 | 665.1–698.4 |
| 19 | Scania G 280 B4x2 | 77.8 | 76.1–80.3 | 15 | 27 | 678.6 | 664.2–700.3 |
| 19 | Scania G 450 B4x2 | 77.8 | 76–79.2 | 23 | 27 | 678.4 | 663.3–690.6 |
| 19 | Scania R 410 B4x2 | 77.8 | 75.1–80.7 | 48 | 72 | 678.5 | 655–704.1 |
| 19 | Volvo FE, 188 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 77.8 | 75.5–94.6 | 30 | 49 | 678.5 | 658.7–825.2 |
| 24 | Volvo FH, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 77.9 | 77.9–82.9 | 31 | 65 | 679.3 | 679.1–723.2 |
| 25 | DAF CF 430 FA | 78.1 | 76.5–80.1 | 13 | 19 | 680.9 | 667.5–698.5 |
| 25 | MAN TGS 18.330 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 78.1 | 75.3–83.8 | 94 | 102 | 681.5 | 656.8–730.9 |
| 27 | Scania G 410 B4x2 | 78.3 | 75.9–88 | 37 | 44 | 682.8 | 662.2–767.2 |
| 28 | Scania P 500 B4x2 | 78.5 | 77–89.8 | 15 | 18 | 684.3 | 672–783.3 |
| 28 | Scania R 370 B4x2 | 78.5 | 77.3–80.1 | 9 | 11 | 684.8 | 674.5–698.3 |
| 30 | Scania G 540 B4x2 | 78.6 | 77.3–79.5 | 9 | 10 | 685.3 | 674.5–693 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 68 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 14 l/100 km apart (18.7%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 16,800 litres a year, or £23,520.
Where it stops mattering: 56 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry alone span 25.1 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
40 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
10 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 3 t, reporting period 2020.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2020 declarationsLowest: Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 71.5 l/100 km · 68 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2020 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 71.5 | 67.8–91.8 | 33 | 36 | 3,119.8 | 2,958.4–4,002.1 |
| 2 | MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 72 | 70.7–76.6 | 15 | 15 | 3,139 | 3,081.9–3,339.2 |
| 3 | Scania R 360 B4x2 | 72.1 | 72.1–75.6 | 7 | 13 | 3,145.4 | 3,145.1–3,298.9 |
| 4 | DAF XF 450 FA | 72.2 | 71.2–74.8 | 31 | 75 | 3,147.6 | 3,103–3,264 |
| 5 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 73.2 | 71.1–77.7 | 20 | 24 | 3,194.4 | 3,102.8–3,386.5 |
| 6 | MAN TGS 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2022) | 73.9 | 72.2–78.2 | 53 | 62 | 3,221.5 | 3,147.7–3,410.5 |
| 6 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 73.9 | 72.8–74.9 | 21 | 21 | 3,222 | 3,175.6–3,264.5 |
| 8 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 74 | 73.2–77.5 | 113 | 122 | 3,227.9 | 3,192.6–3,380.3 |
| 9 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 74.1 | 72.2–75.5 | 43 | 47 | 3,233.4 | 3,146.9–3,294.3 |
| 9 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 74.1 | 73.1–84 | 74 | 148 | 3,231.8 | 3,188.4–3,664.9 |
| 9 | Scania S 450 B4x2 | 74.1 | 72.9–75.3 | 19 | 26 | 3,232.1 | 3,179.4–3,283.9 |
| 12 | Scania S 410 B4x2 | 74.2 | 73.4–75.6 | 12 | 15 | 3,237.2 | 3,200.6–3,298.9 |
| 13 | Scania R 500 B4x2 | 74.3 | 73.6–76.2 | 19 | 21 | 3,241.9 | 3,209.8–3,322.5 |
| 14 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 74.4 | 72.4–76.2 | 63 | 101 | 3,242.9 | 3,159.5–3,322.6 |
| 14 | Scania S 500 B4x2 | 74.4 | 73.7–76.2 | 11 | 12 | 3,244.5 | 3,215.4–3,325.1 |
| 16 | MAN TGS 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2021) | 74.5 | 72.1–86.4 | 70 | 73 | 3,250.5 | 3,146.3–3,766.8 |
| 16 | Volvo FE, 188 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 74.5 | 72.4–90.1 | 30 | 49 | 3,249.1 | 3,158.4–3,930.4 |
| 18 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 74.6 | 73.9–79.6 | 14 | 14 | 3,255.1 | 3,222–3,473.5 |
| 19 | DAF CF 370 FA | 74.7 | 74–78 | 36 | 88 | 3,257 | 3,225.5–3,402.8 |
| 20 | Scania G 280 B4x2 | 74.8 | 73.3–76.6 | 15 | 27 | 3,262.9 | 3,198.6–3,342.2 |
| 20 | Scania G 450 B4x2 | 74.8 | 73.5–76.2 | 23 | 27 | 3,260 | 3,207.1–3,324.4 |
| 22 | Scania R 410 B4x2 | 74.9 | 72.4–78.1 | 48 | 72 | 3,266.6 | 3,155.8–3,407.6 |
| 23 | DAF XF 480 FA | 75.1 | 73.7–77.5 | 51 | 73 | 3,274.8 | 3,214.4–3,378.6 |
| 23 | MAN TGS 18.330 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 75.1 | 72.4–80.2 | 94 | 102 | 3,274.3 | 3,155.7–3,499.8 |
| 25 | Volvo FH, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75.2 | 75.2–80.1 | 31 | 65 | 3,280.2 | 3,279.2–3,491.9 |
| 26 | Scania G 410 B4x2 | 75.3 | 72.9–85.3 | 37 | 44 | 3,283.4 | 3,181.4–3,722 |
| 27 | DAF CF 430 FA | 75.4 | 73.8–77.4 | 13 | 19 | 3,288 | 3,217.5–3,373.7 |
| 27 | Iveco Stralis, 265 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75.4 | 74–81.2 | 9 | 10 | 3,286.2 | 3,227.5–3,541.2 |
| 27 | Scania P 500 B4x2 | 75.4 | 74.2–86.1 | 15 | 18 | 3,288 | 3,235.6–3,755.7 |
| 30 | Scania P 250 B4x2, 6.7 L (2019–2023) | 75.5 | 72.6–84.4 | 117 | 176 | 3,293.1 | 3,166.6–3,680 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 68 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 14.5 l/100 km apart (20.2%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 17,400 litres a year, or £24,360.
Where it stops mattering: 54 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry alone span 24 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
40 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
10 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 0.6 t, reporting period 2020.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2019 declarationsLowest: MAN TGM 19.320 4x2, 75.3 l/100 km · 77 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 3 tonne payload, 2019 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 75.3 | 74.6–78.6 | 16 | 17 | 656.5 | 651–685.3 |
| 2 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75.7 | 71.1–101.6 | 44 | 54 | 660.6 | 620.4–886.5 |
| 3 | DAF XF 450 FA | 76 | 73.4–78.6 | 77 | 113 | 663 | 640–685.7 |
| 4 | DAF CF 410 FA | 77.3 | 74.5–82.6 | 85 | 99 | 674.4 | 649.7–720.6 |
| 5 | MAN TGS 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2021) | 77.4 | 75.6–82.1 | 67 | 76 | 674.9 | 659.5–716.2 |
| 5 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 77.4 | 76.5–78.7 | 16 | 16 | 674.8 | 667.7–686.8 |
| 5 | Scania R 500 B4x2 | 77.4 | 76.2–79.9 | 22 | 26 | 674.9 | 664.9–696.8 |
| 5 | Scania S 500 B4x2 | 77.4 | 74.9–79.8 | 17 | 20 | 675.1 | 653.6–695.8 |
| 9 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 77.5 | 75.3–78.2 | 45 | 53 | 675.6 | 656.5–682.4 |
| 10 | MAN TGS 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2022) | 77.6 | 75.1–82.4 | 30 | 33 | 677.1 | 655–718.8 |
| 10 | Scania R 320 B4x2 | 77.6 | 76.4–78.7 | 7 | 13 | 677.1 | 666.8–686.8 |
| 12 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 77.7 | 76–82.4 | 179 | 195 | 677.5 | 663.2–718.3 |
| 13 | DAF CF 480 FA | 77.8 | 76.6–80.4 | 14 | 16 | 678.6 | 667.7–701.2 |
| 13 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 77.8 | 75.9–80.6 | 24 | 32 | 678.4 | 662.2–703.2 |
| 13 | Scania P 500 B4x2 | 77.8 | 76.4–89.7 | 20 | 28 | 678.2 | 666–782.6 |
| 16 | Scania S 450 B4x2 | 77.9 | 76.2–79.9 | 23 | 34 | 679.1 | 664.5–696.5 |
| 17 | Scania P 250 B4x2, 6.7 L (2019–2023) | 78 | 76.6–87.6 | 244 | 487 | 680.8 | 668.2–764.1 |
| 18 | DAF CF 370 FA | 78.1 | 76.1–81.8 | 75 | 114 | 681.6 | 663.5–713.4 |
| 18 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 78.1 | 75.1–87.9 | 34 | 47 | 680.8 | 655.4–767 |
| 18 | Scania G 450 B4x2 | 78.1 | 76.3–84.9 | 36 | 42 | 680.9 | 665.8–740.9 |
| 21 | Iveco Stralis, 265 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 78.2 | 75.4–85.4 | 42 | 47 | 682.3 | 657.3–744.9 |
| 21 | MAN TGS 18.330 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 78.2 | 76.4–83.9 | 60 | 67 | 682.4 | 666.4–731.5 |
| 23 | DAF XF 480 FA | 78.3 | 76.5–82.1 | 74 | 101 | 682.9 | 667.1–716.4 |
| 23 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 78.3 | 75.7–89.3 | 105 | 233 | 682.6 | 660.5–778.7 |
| 23 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 78.3 | 75.8–79.8 | 60 | 107 | 682.8 | 661.5–695.6 |
| 26 | Scania G 320 B4x2 | 78.4 | 75–84.5 | 43 | 49 | 683.7 | 654.4–736.9 |
| 27 | DAF CF 430 FA | 78.5 | 77.4–82.1 | 16 | 16 | 684.8 | 674.9–715.9 |
| 28 | Scania P 220 B4x2 | 79 | 77.2–87.3 | 66 | 97 | 688.8 | 673.8–761.1 |
| 29 | DAF CF 260 FA | 79.1 | 77.6–87.7 | 255 | 436 | 690 | 676.7–765.3 |
| 29 | Scania G 280 B4x2 | 79.1 | 76.3–80.9 | 41 | 60 | 690.1 | 665.2–705.5 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 77 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 16.1 l/100 km apart (21.3%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 19,320 litres a year, or £27,048.
Where it stops mattering: 60 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the Volvo FE, 188 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry alone span 32.1 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
32 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
2 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 3 t, reporting period 2019.
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2019 declarationsLowest: MAN TGM 19.320 4x2, 71.8 l/100 km · 77 models ranked
Municipal utility 4×2 rigid lorries, 0.6 tonne payload, 2019 declarations
Declared to the regulatorTable view
| Rank | Model | Median l/100 km | Range | Configurations | Vehicles | Median g CO₂/t·km | CO₂ range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAN TGM 19.320 4x2 | 71.8 | 71.1–74.1 | 16 | 17 | 3,130.7 | 3,100.5–3,232.7 |
| 2 | Volvo FE, 263 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 72.4 | 67.9–96.9 | 44 | 54 | 3,158.9 | 2,960.6–4,226 |
| 3 | DAF XF 450 FA | 73.2 | 70.8–75.8 | 77 | 113 | 3,194.1 | 3,088.1–3,303.9 |
| 4 | MAN TGS 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2021) | 74.2 | 72.8–79 | 67 | 76 | 3,237.3 | 3,174.7–3,446 |
| 4 | MAN TGX 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 74.2 | 73.5–75.7 | 16 | 16 | 3,236.7 | 3,204.9–3,300.2 |
| 6 | DAF CF 410 FA | 74.4 | 71.9–79.6 | 85 | 99 | 3,246.6 | 3,135.3–3,471.1 |
| 6 | Scania R 320 B4x2 | 74.4 | 73.8–75.5 | 7 | 13 | 3,246.6 | 3,219.8–3,294.6 |
| 6 | Scania S 500 B4x2 | 74.4 | 72.7–76.3 | 17 | 20 | 3,246.6 | 3,168.9–3,325.9 |
| 9 | DAF CF 320 FA, 4x2 (2018–2023) | 74.5 | 73.2–78.8 | 179 | 195 | 3,250.1 | 3,193.4–3,438.1 |
| 10 | MAN TGS 18.400 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2022) | 74.6 | 72.1–79.1 | 30 | 33 | 3,255.1 | 3,143.5–3,451.2 |
| 10 | MAN TGX 18.360 4x2, 9 L, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 74.6 | 72.8–75.2 | 45 | 53 | 3,253.6 | 3,174.6–3,281.4 |
| 12 | Scania P 250 B4x2, 6.7 L (2019–2023) | 74.8 | 73.2–84.3 | 244 | 487 | 3,263.5 | 3,194.3–3,676.1 |
| 12 | Scania R 500 B4x2 | 74.8 | 73.7–76.9 | 22 | 26 | 3,260.5 | 3,214.2–3,354.9 |
| 14 | Scania G 450 B4x2 | 74.9 | 72.8–82.3 | 36 | 42 | 3,265.8 | 3,174.1–3,588 |
| 15 | Iveco Stralis, 265 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry | 75 | 72.6–82 | 42 | 47 | 3,272.8 | 3,168.3–3,576.4 |
| 15 | Scania P 500 B4x2 | 75 | 73.8–86.3 | 20 | 28 | 3,268.9 | 3,216.9–3,763.3 |
| 15 | Scania S 450 B4x2 | 75 | 72.9–76.9 | 23 | 34 | 3,270.7 | 3,177.4–3,351.9 |
| 18 | MAN TGS 18.330 4x2, rigid lorry (2019–2023) | 75.1 | 73.5–80.6 | 60 | 67 | 3,274 | 3,204.1–3,513 |
| 18 | Scania G 360 B4x2 | 75.1 | 71.6–84.2 | 34 | 47 | 3,276.1 | 3,123.4–3,670.5 |
| 20 | DAF CF 370 FA | 75.2 | 73.4–78.9 | 75 | 114 | 3,278.5 | 3,200.1–3,440.7 |
| 20 | DAF CF 480 FA | 75.2 | 74.1–77.6 | 14 | 16 | 3,278 | 3,230.1–3,384.1 |
| 20 | Scania G 500 B4x2 | 75.2 | 73.2–77.7 | 24 | 32 | 3,279.2 | 3,192.1–3,388 |
| 20 | Scania R 450 B4x2 | 75.2 | 72.5–76.9 | 60 | 107 | 3,281.5 | 3,162.5–3,351.7 |
| 24 | DAF CF 260 FA | 75.3 | 74.2–84.4 | 255 | 436 | 3,282 | 3,235.4–3,679.3 |
| 25 | Scania G 320 B4x2 | 75.4 | 72.5–81 | 43 | 49 | 3,289.3 | 3,160.9–3,531.5 |
| 25 | Scania P 450 B4x2 | 75.4 | 72.9–85.3 | 105 | 233 | 3,286.4 | 3,181–3,718.9 |
| 27 | DAF XF 480 FA | 75.6 | 73.9–78.3 | 74 | 101 | 3,295.6 | 3,223.7–3,413.1 |
| 28 | Scania G 280 B4x2 | 75.7 | 73.6–77.7 | 41 | 60 | 3,301.5 | 3,211.6–3,390.4 |
| 28 | Scania P 220 B4x2 | 75.7 | 73.8–84.2 | 66 | 97 | 3,303.2 | 3,216.4–3,670 |
| 30 | DAF CF 430 FA | 75.8 | 74.6–78.9 | 16 | 16 | 3,304.5 | 3,255.4–3,440.6 |
Showing the 30 lowest declared figures of 77 ranked here. Every model has its own page, reached from its make or its range.
What the difference is worth
The lowest and highest ranked here are 14.8 l/100 km apart (20.6%). At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre, that is about 17,760 litres a year, or £24,864.
Where it stops mattering: 57 models here are within 10% of the lowest figure, inside the tolerance of declared figures, so the ranking between them is not a reason to choose one over another. The specification ordered matters too: declared figures for the Volvo FE, 188 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry alone span 31.7 l/100 km across its configurations.
The price is an assumption for illustration, not a price we track; use your own. Declared figures compare vehicles with each other on a standard route; they are not what one lorry will use on your roads.
32 models not ranked: fewer than ten declared vehicles behind the figure
2 more are not listed here; each has its own page.
Declared by each manufacturer under EU heavy-duty CO₂ monitoring (Regulation (EU) 2018/956), simulated with the EU's VECTO tool (Regulation (EU) 2017/2400). Source: European Environment Agency. Payload 0.6 t, reporting period 2019.